Have you been following this story about Jim Russell, who is running for Nita Lowey’s seat in Congress?
He’s well known as an anti-immigration advocate from Hawthorne. Now he wants to talk about the economy as he aims for Washington.
But the Republican Party has pulled its support for him — although he still may appear on the ballot — because of an “essay” he wrote in 2001.
The essay will be described in many ways. Controversial. Racist. Anti-Semitic.
I don’t normally throw around that particular N word. I hate it when politicians and commentators casually describe opponents as Nazis or Communists. I think those labels should be saved for the real deal.
But the N word is what comes to mind when I read Russell’s “The Western Contribution to World History.”
His whole point is that European contributions to Western civilization are being destroyed because Europeans are getting too close to non-Europeans.
Everything started going wrong, he writes, when Alexander the Great conquered Persia and married a Persian princess. He became “the first apostle of multiculturalism and demonstrated the ethnocultural dangers of empire-building.”
He later laments that people in “so-called underdeveloped nations” are living longer because of Western medicine and that Western advances in transportation have reduced the West’s isolation. “As a result,” he writes, “we must develop a heightened awareness of alternate social isolating mechanisms, such as physical appearance, if we wish to enhance our prospects for survival.”
So get to work, Dr. Mengele.
Russell also embraces eugenics (“improving” the human gene pool), promotes psuedo-scholars with far-right and Nazi backgrounds, and offers that “Welfare does away with natural selection.”
And, boy, he doesn’t like the Jews.
He writes: “From Samuel Morse, Nikola Tesla and Guglielmo Marconi to Thomas Edison, Alexander Graham Bell and Philo Farnsworth came great inventions with the potential to enlighten and fortify our People. Yet this potential was never realized. Instead these inventions were hijacked by Mayer, Thalberg, Warner, and Cohn et al who sought to utilize our media for their financial gain, or worse, to manipulate our opinions and behavior.”
Sounds like a page from Mein Kampf.
Russell later praises Ezra Pound and T.S. Eliot for for seeking to “preserve our culture.”
He drops in Eliot’s conditions for an “optimal society,” including “The population should be homogeneous” and “…reasons of race and culture combine to make any large number of free-thinking Jews undesirable.”
And there’s this: “There is now afoot a conscious effort to de-Europeanize and to re-Judaize Christianity, through scriptural revision, internal treachery and external pressure.”
During a press conference yesterday and an appearance today on Phil Reisman’s radio show, Russell simply refused to address the points he made in his article. He clumsily changed the subject or said that certain points were being overemphasized or taken out of context.
He said he likes the way minorities dress well at church.
But he’s still running for Congress.
He wants to talk about jobs.